Re: Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1: OpenWRT as associated project

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, secretary(at)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1: OpenWRT as associated project
Date: 2009-03-18 18:09:52
Message-ID: 1237399792.4328.9.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 10:51 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jimmy,

> Given that SPI will just continue to add affiliates over time, I
> personally think that allowing *any* organization to have more than one
> authoritative liaison is a mistake. It doesn't scale for the number of
> projects SPI needs to support. I'm not a board member, I don't get a
> vote on this, but that's my opinion.
>

Well as it stands I think the resolution is flawed. We can not have more
than one liaison. It needs to be reworded in a way that the liaison has
delegation authority or something if they want a backup, but a "pair" of
equals is a bad idea.

Joshua D. Drake

> --Josh Berkus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spi-general mailing list
> Spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
> http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
>
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2009-03-18 18:18:43 Re: Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1: OpenWRT as associated project
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-03-18 17:51:44 Re: Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1: OpenWRT as associated project