Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.05.bg.1: NTPsec as associated project

From: Mark Atwood <me(at)mark(dot)atwood(dot)name>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.05.bg.1: NTPsec as associated project
Date: 2016-05-11 03:34:48
Message-ID: 1462937688.1544624.604268769.4DBF1B9C@webmail.messagingengine.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On Tue, May 10, 2016, at 14:13, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> I would like to see something like the following added to the resolution:
>
> 6. In the event that the NTPsec project dissolves without defining what
> SPI shall do with the managed assets or the NTPsec project becomes
> provable uncontactable for SPI, the board reserves the right to assign
> those assets to it's general fund.
>
> That maybe needs a bit of rewording as i am not a native english
> speaker, but i hope everyone gets what i mean here.
>
> The smae paragraph should IMHO be added to all the other 4 resolutions
> we tend to vote on in two days.

As the NTPsec contact, I have no objection to that.

..m

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Michlmayr 2016-06-01 17:33:41 Resignation of Robert Brockway from SPI board
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-05-10 21:41:34 Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.01.bg.1: ArduPilot as associated project