David Graham writes ("Re: [draft] Proposed resolution 2003-01-06.wta.2"):
> I don't think it's a good idea to specify what the committee looks at. I
> think it'll be necessary for the committee to review every section of the
> by-laws and it may find it necessary to propose several minor amendments
> for consistency and clarity as well as structure.
That's what the catch-all is for. But we should explain that there
are a couple of things that we specifically want the committee to
address, while they're at it.
Ian.