Re: [draft] Proposed resolution 2003-01-06.wta.2

From: Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org>
Cc: board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: [draft] Proposed resolution 2003-01-06.wta.2
Date: 2003-01-07 17:40:15
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

John Goerzen writes ("Re: [draft] Proposed resolution 2003-01-06.wta.2"):
> Wichert Akkerman <wichert(at)wiggy(dot)net> writes:
> > This committee shall operate openly in view of the public. Subject
> > to approval of the board, the committee shall make reasonable procedures
> Can you clarify whether "Subject to the approval of the board" means
> that "approval by the board must be sought before implementing
> procedures" or that "the board may overrule decisions made regarding
> operating procedures"?

The latter would be more sensible given the glacial speed of the
board's operation, but the former is what's written. How about this
language instead:

This committee shall operate openly in view of the public. The
committee itself shall determine reasonable procedures for
transacting its business, both for its operations and decisionmaking.
(The board reserves the right to veto or modify those procedures.)



Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2003-01-07 17:59:29 Re: [draft] Proposed resolution 2003-01-06.wta.2
Previous Message Branden Robinson / SPI Treasurer 2003-01-07 17:21:33 Re: [draft] Proposed resolution 2003-01-06.wta.2