Re: Board meeting procedure

From: Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: spi-general(at)spi-inc(dot)org, board(at)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Board meeting procedure
Date: 2003-07-29 22:43:37
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

Wichert Akkerman writes ("Re: Board meeting procedure"):
> Previously Ian Jackson wrote:
> > 9. There shall be strictly no discussion during the meeting. Anything
> > that requires more discussion than has taken place before the
> > meeting shall be postponed until next meeting or email voting. If
> > board members feel the discussion has not been adequate then they
> > should vote NO on the relevant motion.
> Is this too strict possibly? This will reduce meetings to voting and
> notices. I would like to leave some room to discuss alternate already
> proposed resolutions.

Surely we can _discuss_ alternative resolutions by email in advance.
That way everyone gets a chance to comment in detail and with a bit of
time to think out a response. If we still disagree then we can vote
on the variants.


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Goerzen 2003-07-30 14:11:41 Re: Board meeting procedure
Previous Message Ean Schuessler 2003-07-29 22:29:47 Re: Board meeting procedure