Martin Schulze writes ("Re: Resolution 2003-10-14.iwj.1c"):
> I'm not convinced that these sections [the end parts with the
> board's apology etc -iwj] should be part of either resolution. They
> don't contribute any useful input except slamming on the board for
> $whatever and the bylaws committee.
Well, given that it's the board passing the resolution, I think the
board deciding to apologise is hardly `slamming'. I think it's only
fair enough. The board may disagree, of course.
Certainly there's no intent to slam the bylaws committee.
Ian.