Re: Resolution 2003-10-14.iwj.1c

From: Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-board(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolution 2003-10-14.iwj.1c
Date: 2003-10-14 18:33:17
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

Martin Schulze writes ("Re: Resolution 2003-10-14.iwj.1c"):
> I'm not convinced that these sections [the end parts with the
> board's apology etc -iwj] should be part of either resolution. They
> don't contribute any useful input except slamming on the board for
> $whatever and the bylaws committee.

Well, given that it's the board passing the resolution, I think the
board deciding to apologise is hardly `slamming'. I think it's only
fair enough. The board may disagree, of course.

Certainly there's no intent to slam the bylaws committee.


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Graham 2003-10-14 18:36:11 Resolution 2003-10-14.dbg.1
Previous Message David Graham 2003-10-14 18:29:31 Re: Resolution 2003-10-14.iwj.1c