Re: Election resolution - substantive issues

From: Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-board(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Election resolution - substantive issues
Date: 2003-10-14 19:07:06
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

David Graham writes ("Re: Election resolution - substantive issues"):
> Clause 15 of 2003-10-14.dbg.1 forces the board to address the issue of the
> by-laws immediately following the election. New by-laws will better
> address this eventuality than forcing the quorum higher than it needs to
> be to function.

No, clause 15 doesn't force the board to do anything. It has the
board _promise_ to do something, which is _not_ the same !


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Jackson 2003-10-14 19:15:09 Resolution 2003-10-14.iwj.6, .3, .4, .5 - election
Previous Message David Graham 2003-10-14 18:59:33 Re: Election resolution - substantive issues