Re: GNUstep project support

From: Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
Cc: David Graham - SPI Secretary <cdlu(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, Adam Fedor <fedor(at)doc(dot)com>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-www(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: GNUstep project support
Date: 2004-11-04 19:33:26
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

Taral writes ("Re: GNUstep project support"):
> I believe this (par. 4) is a statement of authority, not a statement of
> Advisorship. It gives Adam the authority to speak on behalf of the
> project to SPI. Think of it like a liaison thing. I expect that the
> GNUstep project will nominate a person (possibly Adam) to be
> Representative Advisor, and Adam will inform SPI of this fact. At that
> point, Adam's status as liaison will be unnecessary.

Not unnecessary, because Adam could still fire the advisor.


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Graham - SPI Secretary 2004-11-04 19:51:02 Re: GNUstep project support
Previous Message Ian Jackson 2004-11-04 19:31:16 Re: GNUstep project support