Fwd: MS definition of "open source"

From: Dave Whitinger <dave(at)linuxtoday(dot)com>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Fwd: MS definition of "open source"
Date: 1999-04-09 18:58:03
Message-ID: 199904091858.NAA10693@utopia.whitinger.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

------ Forwarded message ------
From: Dwight Johnson <dwj(at)linuxtoday(dot)com>
Subject: MS definition of "open source" -- opportunity for action
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 11:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: Dwight Johnson <dwj(at)linuxtoday(dot)com>

PC Week, "Microsoft to go open source? Not likely"

>Muth said comments made by Microsoft President Steve Ballmer and
>other company executives at the Windows Hardware Engineering
>Conference in Los Angeles earlier this week were interpreted without
>having a clear understanding of how Microsoft defines "open source."
>Muth said the term "open source" has a variety of meanings, and the
>company's definition differs from the one used to describe Unix and
>the increasingly popular Linux -- in which a worldwide community of
>developers is able to freely extend, modify and commercialize versions
>of the software."

>... its definition of "open source code licenses" means making the
>technology available to only a select group of computer scientists,
>researchers, original equipment manufacturers and engineering
>partners, who are offered the code under a set of restrictions that
>prohibit them from commercializing the technology in any way, Muth


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anthony Towns 1999-04-10 04:03:56 Re: [PROPOSAL] Open Source certification
Previous Message Christoph Lameter 1999-04-09 08:47:32 SGVLUG wants to apply for SPI Membership