Re: SPI Bylaws Amendment - Removal by Membership

From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: spi-general(at)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPI Bylaws Amendment - Removal by Membership
Date: 2002-12-12 14:21:53
Message-ID: 20021212142153.GA20847@wile.excelhustler.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:27:00PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> How about adding that if a director or officer has missed three
> consecutive board meetings, the threshold becoems one-half?

I would be amenable to that, though I personally don't want to draft it.
The recent discussion shows that there is some disagreement about just what
constitutes a board meeting, so I'd rather have someone more familiar with
that issue draft such an amendment. I wonder if the threshold should be a
little higher (last four meetings) or based on something else (half of the
meetings in the last six months)?

I might also throw out there something to consider for such a clause: do we
count both "absent" and "absent with regrets"? For instance, if someone
takes a three-month holiday out of the country for summer, and notifies the
secretary, they could be considered absent with regrets and not really
inactive. On the other hand, a mostly inactive person that wishes to hold
on to his seat could just be perpetually absent with regrets. I'm not sure
what the right answer to this is.

-- John

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Theodore Ts'o 2002-12-12 14:54:00 Re: SPI Bylaws Amendment - Removal by Membership
Previous Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2002-12-11 23:30:00 Observations and suggestions