Re: Next step -- Deciding on output

From: Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
To: spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Next step -- Deciding on output
Date: 2003-02-04 22:29:15
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-bylaws

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 03:09:39PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> I agree that (1) and (2) should be in the final document (I wouldn't
> call it a resolution exactly) produced by our committee. I think (3) is
> slightly different, and also belongs in the same document. Here is how I
> see the final document structure (rough idea):

I strongly disagree. Comittees usually produce a resolution, fully
formed, on which the parent body can vote. Since the parent body is
always allowed to table or amend the resolution, this does not limit it
in any way. Providing a fully formed resolution also reduces the chance
of any miscommunication, as well as making less work for members outside
the committee.

I can look up the full rationale in RRONR, if you like.

Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me.
"Most parents have better things to do with their time than take care of
their children." -- Me


Browse spi-bylaws by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Taral 2003-02-04 22:32:08 Re: Next step -- Deciding on output
Previous Message John Goerzen 2003-02-04 21:00:57 Re: Next step -- Deciding on output