Re: Next step -- Deciding on output

From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org>
To: spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Next step -- Deciding on output
Date: 2003-02-05 19:13:06
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-bylaws

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:08:53PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> What I'm suggesting is that in our proposed motion/resolution/whatever, we
> leave off the WHEREAS part. I think that we do not need to be expressing a
> "sense of the membership" about background information, just getting it
> done. This also makes reforms easier to pass because disagreements on
> background information will not lead to blocking passage.

For precedent on how this has been done in the past in SPI, I refer you to:

Also it is important to note that Articles 1 and 2 are immutable.

-- John

Browse spi-bylaws by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Taral 2003-02-05 21:51:15 Re: Next step -- Deciding on output
Previous Message John Goerzen 2003-02-05 19:08:53 Re: Next step -- Deciding on output