Re: Next step -- Deciding on output

From: Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
To: spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Next step -- Deciding on output
Date: 2003-02-06 05:12:36
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-bylaws

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:17:27PM -0500, David Graham wrote:
> I'd suggest an output from the committee of a series of modifications to
> the by-laws listed with the following information, something like:
> Modification #5: article 10 paragraph 2:

> On a ballot it would look something like that plus "accept this change?
> [y/n]"

I disagree with this. Line iteming the bylaws doesn't seem particularly
wise right now, since we're likely to make large-scope changes. If the
board has issues with our proposed resolution, they will send it back to
us to address them.

Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me.
"Most parents have better things to do with their time than take care of
their children." -- Me


Browse spi-bylaws by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Goerzen 2003-02-06 15:02:23 Re: Next step -- Deciding on output
Previous Message David Graham 2003-02-06 03:17:27 Re: Next step -- Deciding on output