Re: Ties in Elections

From: Peter Palfrader <weasel(at)spi-inc(dot)org>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ties in Elections
Date: 2003-02-06 20:23:02
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

On Thu, 06 Feb 2003, Branden Robinson / SPI Treasurer wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 07:25:17AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I suppose not voting for all 8 candidate (that is providing a string
> > with less than 8 characters) will result in "none of the above" to rank
> > higher than the candidates not figuring in the string, right ?
> It certainly should, or the vote tabulating software is horrendously
> buggy and should not be trusted to return valid results.

"none of the above" is no option in this elections. Is there any reason
it should have been?

As I understand this scheme if you don't rank an option you make no
statement about your preference for or against it at all.

PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred. | : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System | `-


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Goerzen 2003-02-07 02:08:50 Bylaws committee update
Previous Message Branden Robinson / SPI Treasurer 2003-02-06 16:13:04 SPI on NewsForge