Re: #03: Board meeting quorum issues

From: Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
To: David Graham <cdlu(at)pkl(dot)net>
Subject: Re: #03: Board meeting quorum issues
Date: 2003-03-24 22:20:46
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-bylaws

On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:40:49PM -0500, David Graham wrote:
> The reason I think quorum should be eliminated is that a board member who
> is interested in the functionning of the organisation will make evey
> attempt to attend meetings. If a resolution or a motion is passed that the
> board member does not favour, that board member will learn not to miss
> board meetings.

This argument is somewhat persuasive -- in the case of sufficient notice
and objection periods.

> I believe board members should be allowed to appoint proxies to attend
> board meetings on their behalf, with limits - such as you can only attend
> 25% of meetings by proxy and/or no individual can proxy for you more than
> once.

This I think I could find acceptable.

Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me.
"Most parents have better things to do with their time than take care of
their children." -- Me


Browse spi-bylaws by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Goerzen 2003-03-26 15:03:11 Re: #01: Election of board members by SPI membership
Previous Message Taral 2003-03-24 22:19:29 Re: #02: Recall of Board Members