Re: #06: Public resolutions

From: David Graham <cdlu(at)pkl(dot)net>
To: spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: #06: Public resolutions
Date: 2003-04-01 15:30:28
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-bylaws

"Any resolution passed by the Board of Directors of this organisation may,
with the absolute unanimous consent of all Board members, be kept
confidential from the membership and the public. If any Board member
decides at a future date that the resolution should no longer be
confidential, unanimous consent will be considered to no longer exist and
the resolution will henceforth be available to the membership.

"No resolution may be considered enacted or enforceable until it is
available to the entire contributing membership, notwithstanding (above
paragraph reference number)."

How's that?

David "cdlu" Graham cdlu(at)pkl(dot)net
Guelph, Ontario SMS: +1 519 760 1409

On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, John Goerzen wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:42:49AM -0500, David Graham wrote:
> > The Employmee Management (for the sake of argument) Committee passes an
> > internal resolution which should be kept confidential. Because of the
> > money-nature of this resolution, the Board must give its assent, and so
> > it, too, must pass the same resolution. That resolution is no less
> > confidential now then it was at the EMC.
> I think that there is no reason to keep this from the membership.
> Many boards that I'm familiar with have to publicize this. For instance,
> the local school board sets salaries for each employee of the school and the
> board members themselves. The public has access to all this information.
> Church organizations are often run the same way. You can find out how much
> the organist is getting paid if you're a member of the church. Same goes
> for many other charities.
> > I think it's very important that the board be left with a mechanism
> > allowing it to keep resolutions secret though, as it's what you don't see
> > coming that invariably gets you. Getting unanimous consent in this
> > community is tremendously difficult, so requiring it is as good a
> > safeguard as any against irrational or excessive use of this clause.
> I'd now be prepared to accept something along these lines as a compromise.
> Your point about getting unanimous consent is well-taken.
> I would like to add, though, that unless this unanimous consent is attained,
> that no resolution passed by the board may be considered to be enforced
> until it has been published at a location where all contributing members can
> see it, along with a roll call of yea/nea/abstain votes on a
> per-board-member basis.
> Such a place could be the SPI website or an e-mail to spi-private.
> Would you like to draw up a proposed amendment or should I do that?
> -- John


Browse spi-bylaws by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Goerzen 2003-04-01 15:37:22 Re: #06: Public resolutions
Previous Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2003-04-01 15:26:54 Re: #02: Recall of Board Members [CALL FOR VOTE]