On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:43:46AM -0500, David Graham wrote:
> Meetings can be held in spi-private instead of spi-board. They're still
> email meetings, other people can still express their views, and the
> meeting is still on record as it's happening.
That would satisfy me. I think the goal is to get the info in the hands of
the members, and that's what I mean when I say "public". I don't see it as
necessary to get the info in the hands of non-members, and so spi-private
would be acceptable in my opinion.