Re: #03: Board meeting quorum issues

From: Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
To: spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: #03: Board meeting quorum issues
Date: 2003-05-09 17:15:29
Message-ID: 20030509171529.GA1152@taral.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-bylaws

On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:45:26AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Also an absention should not count against the unanimous requirement.

Actually...

With 10 members, 5 present, if 4 vote FOR and 1 ABSTAINS, then if all 5
missing members were present and voted AGAINST, it would fail. The
requirement for it to be a valid "bypass" is that the presence of the
remaining members _would not change the outcome_. I'm prepared to allow
ties to go in favor of the members present, but abstentions must work
against the unanimity requirement.

--
Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me.
"Most parents have better things to do with their time than take care of
their children." -- Me

Responses

Browse spi-bylaws by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Goerzen 2003-05-09 19:27:13 Re: #03: Board meeting quorum issues
Previous Message John Goerzen 2003-05-09 16:45:26 Re: #03: Board meeting quorum issues