Re: #03: Board meeting quorum issues

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 04:31:29PM -0400, David Graham wrote:
> That must have been the best piece of work I've ever written. No
> criticism! :)

Shall we go ahead and schedule a vote on this part then:
> > Strike:
> > > The presence of not less than two-thirds of the board members shall
> > > constitute a quorum and shall be necessary to conduct the business of
> > > this organization, but a lesser number may adjourn the meeting for a
> > > period of not more than two weeks from the date scheduled by these
> > > by-laws and the Secretary shall cause a notice of this scheduled meeting
> > > to be sent to all those members who were not present at the meeting
> > > originally called. A quorum as hereinbefore set forth shall be required
> > > at any adjourned meeting.
> >
> > Replace with:
> >
> > "The participation of not less than two-thirds of the board members shall
> > constite a quorum and shall be necessary for an individual vote to be
> > binding, however the participation of no less than one half of board
> > members may result in a binding vote if and only if all participating
> > members agree."