Re: Bylaws committee status

On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:45:31AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> For those that have not been active for some time, I would like you to
> either 1) commit to being more active in the futurex, or 2) tender your
> resignation so we may appoint more active committee members -- either one
> effective immediately.

I'm here. I think the recent stagnation was mostly because there was
nobody to say when discussion was done and turn something into a
proposal.

ObProcess: It is interesting that RRONR states that this is the very
reason modern parliamentary process requires a motion before discussion.
Early processes had the Speaker distilling discussion into a motion, but
that doesn't work nearly as well, as we have seen. Do we want to change
our process?

--
Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me.
"Most parents have better things to do with their time than take care of
their children." -- Me