Re: Next steps

From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org>
To: "Benj(dot) Mako Hill" <mako(at)debian(dot)org>
Cc: spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Next steps
Date: 2003-12-04 14:23:48
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-bylaws

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:44:45AM +0100, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> I'd like to get a sense of the justification behind the proposal as it
> stands and the feelings of the committee about an alternative proposal
> (something along the lines of a 3/3/4 3-year election cycle) to decide
> if making alternative proposal along these lines is something I think
> is a good idea.

Can you elaborate on that proposal a bit? I'm not quite sure what
specifically you're suggesting.

> I'd also like to talk about a transition plan for both or either
> proposals.

Yes, that's a good point as well.

-- John


Browse spi-bylaws by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Graham 2003-12-04 17:36:31 Bylaw proposals revision issue
Previous Message Benj. Mako Hill 2003-12-04 07:44:45 Re: Next steps