Re: Resolution 2004-10-16.dbg.1: Committee Framework

From: Martin Schulze <joey(at)infodrom(dot)org>
To: SPI Board of Directors <board(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolution 2004-10-16.dbg.1: Committee Framework
Date: 2004-10-17 07:46:44
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> BTW, our President already has the bylaws-given authority to appoint
> committees, so I don't know why we always bother with full resolutions
> for them. Or does that only extend to choosing the membership instead
> of the entire committee charter?

Even though it may not be required, I believe that it's good to
form committees through full resolutions, if only to demonstrate
the backing by the board.



Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wichert Akkerman 2004-10-17 15:04:21 Re: making SPI's public mailing lists subscriber-posting-only
Previous Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2004-10-17 07:28:25 Re: Resolution 2004-10-16.dbg.1: Committee Framework