Re: Call for discussion: adding member projects?

From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert(at)wiggy(dot)net>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for discussion: adding member projects?
Date: 2004-11-01 08:56:31
Message-ID: 20041101085631.GC31882@wiggy.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Previously Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Just brainstorming:
> * Projects should not be opposite competitors to current member
> projects (e.g.: a redhat based distro - no, a debian basted distro that
> cooperates with debian - yes)

Why not? A bit of competition can't hurt.

> * Project should have a focus that is more than just one package or
> project (debian, gnome, gnustep, something-like-sourceforge - yes.
> screen, wget, gnupg - no)

Again, I disagree. The current member projects don' even fit that
profile.

Wichert.

--
Wichert Akkerman <wichert(at)wiggy(dot)net> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Fedor 2004-11-01 16:32:06 GNUstep project support
Previous Message Joachim Breitner 2004-11-01 00:39:56 Re: Call for discussion: adding member projects?