Re: money handling

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: money handling
Date: 2006-07-16 19:40:31
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general


> Not the software patenting one. I'm sure we have a plurality on that
> issue.

A plurality isn't good enough. A clear consensus is what you need -- since
SPI is now composed of disparate parts, you can't take action which would
affect all member organizations just on the basis of a 50.5% majority.
You need buy-in from *all* constituent groups individually, as well as a
majority of members. Otherwise, the associated organizations who just
joined will leave.


Josh Berkus
Acting PostgreSQL Liason, SPI
PostgreSQL Core Team


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Perens 2006-07-16 19:46:35 Re: money handling
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-07-16 18:54:16 Re: money handling