| From: | Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Graham <cdlu(at)railfan(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, Michael Schultheiss <spi(at)amellus(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: moving forward |
| Date: | 2006-08-02 15:31:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20060802153134.GQ14285@mail.kaplowitz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-bylaws |
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:03:07AM -0400, David Graham wrote:
> I'd like opinions on whether we can interpret this paragraph to mean
> contrbuting memberships, as would be suggested by article 5, paragraph 1:
> "Any contributing member of SPI is eligible to vote. Non contributing
> members of SPI may not vote. Each voting member shall have exactly one
> vote." Or are we stuck with requiring a 2/3 majority of votes from people
> who are not allowed to vote?
Given that bylaws do have legal force for us, and amending them needs to
be done properly, it might be worth asking Greg (our lawyer).
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Graham | 2006-08-02 15:35:48 | SPI legal question |
| Previous Message | David Graham | 2006-08-02 15:03:07 | moving forward |