Re: Resolution 2007-02-15.jrk.1: Openness of Board Discussions

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: spi-board(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Cc: board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, Jimmy Kaplowitz <treasurer(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, secretary(at)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolution 2007-02-15.jrk.1: Openness of Board Discussions
Date: 2007-02-15 17:30:48
Message-ID: 200702150930.48537.josh@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Jimmy,

> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:18:02PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> > As for the spam problem, instead of deprecating spi-general entirely,
> > I'd much rather have Joerg Jaspert (on our admin team) apply some of the
> > same automated solutions as he has to the DebConf mailing lists, which
> > don't have a spam problem without needing human moderation.
>
> It looks like he has done this, in fact: the last spam I see in the
> spi-general archives is back in June 2006, over half a year ago. It's
> probably safe for you to resusbscribe. :)

I'm not worried if *I'm* subscribed and receiving mail. I am. I'm worried
about the contributing members who said months ago that they had unsubscribed
because of the spam problem.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Project
Core Team Member
(any opinions expressed are my own)

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2007-02-15 17:39:10 Re: [Spi-private] Re: Resolution 2007-02-15.jrk.1: Openness of Board Discussions
Previous Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2007-02-15 17:21:28 Re: Resolution 2007-02-15.jrk.1: Openness of Board Discussions