Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status

From: Theodore Tso <tytso(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status
Date: 2007-03-16 18:09:49
Message-ID: 20070316180949.GA1350@thunk.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:36:57PM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> I have to pick a level of risk to worry about, and I'm much less worried
> about the risk of people inventing disagreements about the DPL's
> identity for sake of DoSing the board than I am about the very real
> likelihood that there will always be DDs who dissent from the majority
> view of the scope of the DPL's authority. I also don't care for this
> purpose if non-DDs are mistaken about any of the above.

The only thing which the SPI should care about with respect to the
authority held by the DPL and the Secretary is their authority with
respect to the requests made to the SPI. And these authorities is
somethign which can and should be very clearly enumerated.

- Ted

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2007-03-16 18:24:48 Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status
Previous Message Ian Jackson 2007-03-16 17:54:47 Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status