Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections

From: Steve Greenland <steveg(at)moregruel(dot)net>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections
Date: 2007-07-25 22:46:20
Message-ID: 20070725224620.GA13562@moregruel.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-announce spi-general

On 25-Jul-07, 15:27 (CDT), Neil McGovern <neilm(at)spi-inc(dot)org> wrote:
> There have also been some queries raised about the implementation of
> condorcet voting that SPI uses. If you have not rated all candidates, it
> is important you check this information to ensure your vote reflects
> your views.
>
> In summary:
> - Not rating a candidate at all does NOT mean that they are automatically
> ranked below other candidates.
> - Additionally, a vote for ONE candidate is equivalent to an empty vote.

Why on earth are you not using the Debian implementation?

Steve

--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net

Responses

Browse spi-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MJ Ray 2007-07-26 08:00:22 Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections
Previous Message Neil McGovern 2007-07-25 20:27:58 Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MJ Ray 2007-07-26 08:00:22 Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections
Previous Message Neil McGovern 2007-07-25 20:27:58 Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections