| From: | Bill Allombert <Bill(dot)Allombert(at)math(dot)u-bordeaux1(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Multi-winner Condorcet, vs STV |
| Date: | 2009-12-12 10:16:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20091212101623.GB28924@yellowpig |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:27:48PM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:53:19PM +0100, Markus Schulze wrote:
> > Hallo,
> >
> > in my opinion, the Schulze STV method is
> > the best multi-winner election method:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_STV
> >
> > See also this list of papers:
> >
> > http://m-schulze.webhop.net/schulze1.pdf
> > http://m-schulze.webhop.net/schulze2.pdf
> > http://m-schulze.webhop.net/schulze3.zip
> >
>
> And is the method already adopted by Debian, IIRC.
Debian does not do multi-winner elections/votes.
But of course one can always frame a multi-winner election as a single-qwinner
on$e: For example with 2 seats and 4 candidates A,B,C and D, provide 6 options.
A&B,A&C,A&D,B&C,B&D,C&D.
Cheers,
Bill.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ian Jackson | 2009-12-14 13:19:13 | Re: Multi-winner Condorcet, vs STV |
| Previous Message | Andrew M.A. Cater | 2009-12-11 22:27:48 | Re: Multi-winner Condorcet, vs STV |