| From: | Luca Filipozzi <lfilipoz(at)emyr(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hilmar Lapp <hlapp(at)drycafe(dot)net> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SPI bylaws overhaul: new discussion draft |
| Date: | 2016-11-16 02:27:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20161116022700.GA4329@snafu.emyr.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 11:36:52AM -0500, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> One thing I’d submit for consideration that could be learned from this and
> change is to take the opportunity to put the text into Markdown (or LaTeX)
> format and host it in version control. Then the version control system does
> the diff, and presenting them, for you without any additional effort.
>
> Here’s an example from the most recent bylaws changes for OBF:
> https://github.com/OBF/obf-docs/pull/28
> https://github.com/OBF/obf-docs/pull/29
>
> I understand that many in SPI have strong reservations about Github, but
> obviously Github is far from the only platform that allows doing this.
I think that the salient points, here, are:
- use a plain text 'source' format for the input
- use a source code management system to capture revisions and produce deltas
- publish the deltas so that the members can easily review the proposed changes
- use a formatter to 'compile' the input into published representation
We can achieve the above wthout having to use github.
I'm perfectly happy to use Markdown and I'd prefer it to LaTeX.
--
Luca Filipozzi
http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-11-16 02:58:26 | Re: SPI bylaws overhaul: new discussion draft |
| Previous Message | Andrew Tridgell | 2016-11-14 22:16:59 | error in paypal accounting |