Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence

From: Bill Allombert <ballombe(at)debian(dot)org>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence
Date: 2016-11-17 18:41:34
Message-ID: 20161117184134.GA3657@yellowpig
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

> On Nov 17, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Josh berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> 2) SPI is a big enough NPO that it really should have at least one paid
> administrative staff member. I believe that Drake previously proposed
> something of the sort?

In my experience, the job of such paid staff member quickly become to do
fundraising so that the NPO has enough cash flow to continue to pay
them, which leads the NPO to become an end onto itself.

Cheers,
Bill.

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh berkus 2016-11-17 18:59:04 Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence
Previous Message Josh berkus 2016-11-17 18:09:16 Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence