Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections)

From: Luca Filipozzi <lfilipoz(at)emyr(dot)net>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections)
Date: 2017-03-02 20:29:01
Message-ID: 20170302202901.GA14254@snafu.emyr.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:18:06PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The choice of voting system should not be left to the Secretary. Currently,
> the proposal is to have the Board select STV. If a future Board wants to
> change its mind and select something else in future, then that is quite
> possible.[1]
>
> ...
>
> [1] Personally I think the voting system should be entrenched in the bylaws
> but I have given up trying to persuade people that the Board election system
> should be defended against the Board.

We discussed the awkwardness of the Board setting the rules for electing the
Board, which is why I suggested during the recent Board meeting that we ask you
to draft the resolution.

Once the proposed revisions to the By-Laws pass, we can start talking about
adding language regarding Board composition and/or Board voting algorithm.

Luca

--
Luca Filipozzi

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Filipus Klutiero 2017-03-03 01:31:51 Concorcet methods (was Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections))
Previous Message Ian Jackson 2017-03-02 19:18:06 Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections)