On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 08:50:09PM -0800, Josh berkus wrote:
> So in all of this discussion, I've not heard anything which seems
> terribly persuasive compared with just taking our existing system and
> fixing the problem with unranked candidates
FWIW this is already fixed; the current system supports both the old
"unranked means no preference" and the preferred "unranked means lower
preference than all ranked" and defaults to the latter.
J.
--
"A true friend knows who you are...but likes you anyway."
This .sig brought to you by the letter C and the number 2
Product of the Republic of HuggieTag