Re: Resolution 2019-05-02.jrk.1: merger into

From: Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org>
To: Peter Cock <p(dot)j(dot)a(dot)cock(at)googlemail(dot)com>, Martin Michlmayr <tbm(at)cyrius(dot)com>
Cc: board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, secretary(at)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolution 2019-05-02.jrk.1: merger into
Date: 2019-05-02 15:13:07
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

Hi Peter and Martin,

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 02:10:52PM +0100, Peter Cock wrote:
> 3. SPI shall no longer actively seek donations for
> Donations which SPI nevertheless for shall be treated as
> donations for
> Replace "nevertheless" with "nevertheless receives", or just "receives"?

Thanks to you and Martin for noticing this. Accepted as "nevertheless
receives." Tim, when you add this to the agenda, please add the word
"receives" after "nevertheless" in the draft I sent earlier today. I'll
check some time in advance of the actual vote to make sure this happens,
so that if not we can still fix it in time and vote on the correct

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 07:55:57PM +0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > 2. and decided to merge, with as the
> > surviving project, due to significant overlap in participants and
> > purpose.
> I'd probably move the "with as the..." to the end.

Both ways read acceptably to me, but putting it at the end feels like it
implies some linkage I didn't intend between the choice of as the
surviving project and the motivation for the merger. I'd rather keep
that sentence as is.

- Jimmy Kaplowitz


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Potter 2019-05-04 09:18:45 Re: Resolution 2019-05-02.jrk.1: merger into
Previous Message Peter Cock 2019-05-02 13:10:52 Re: Resolution 2019-05-02.jrk.1: merger into