Re: [Spi-private] Bruce's Platform

From: Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59-spi(at)srcf(dot)ucam(dot)org>
Cc: spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Spi-private] Bruce's Platform
Date: 2006-07-14 16:50:01
Message-ID: 44B7CB39.6060805@perens.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I find the idea of you defining Debian's role in the SPI/Debian
> relationship insulting.
Well, the social contract does not attempt to define that role, and
anything else I posted is discussion, not an order. You're going
overboard to find it insulting.
> I can't see any realistic way of conforming to article 6 in anything other than a real-time discussion medium.
>
It would look a bit contrived, but could be done. Currently, it would
only have to be done quarterly.

Thanks

Bruce

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-07-14 16:50:14 Re: [Spi-private] SPI board and the software patent issue
Previous Message Bruce Perens 2006-07-14 16:44:32 Re: [Spi-private] Bruce's Platform