Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, leader(at)debian(dot)org, secretary(at)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status
Date: 2007-03-06 21:37:15
Message-ID: 45EDDF0B.9020407@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

>
> If I were the DPL I would consider my position very carefully if a
> recall petition even got enough signatures to go to a ballot.
>

Yeah, I could see that.

> To put this in terms you may be familiar with: Anthony was impeached
> and 15% of the decisionmaking body (those Developers who voted) were
> in favour of forcing him out and holding an emergency election.
>
O.k. this is slightly different than what I was thinking happen. Thanks
for clearing it up.
> No other DPL has done anything controversial enough to put to a vote
> to overrule the decision, let alone been subject to a vote whether to
> recall them.
>
Nod.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

> Ian.
>
>

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Greenland 2007-03-06 23:34:01 Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status
Previous Message Don Armstrong 2007-03-06 20:52:26 Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status