Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josip Rodin <joy(at)entuzijast(dot)net>
Cc: treasurer(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status
Date: 2007-03-11 23:14:37
Message-ID: 45F48D5D.9020200@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general


> With this SPI resolution saying that those developers can then inform the
> SPI board about that injunction, which the SPI board should interpret as
> a change in authority of the project leader (ignoring the fact that it's
> also a dispute - the injunction is a clear constitutional tool and not a
> matter of judgement), we would actually be very swift.
>
>> Also, I think we have more faith in our ability to pick a liason who won't
>> go berserk. ;-)
>
> I know you're joking, but jokes aside, I don't think it should be an issue
> of faith.

Well Debian never spends any money anyway so... ;)

Joshua D. Drake

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josip Rodin 2007-03-11 23:25:30 Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status
Previous Message Josip Rodin 2007-03-11 22:28:25 Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status