Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status
Date: 2007-03-16 19:46:29
Message-ID: 45FAF415.8030403@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general


>
> As for the broader issue at hand, I very much agree with Ian that if the
> Debian liaisons to SPI don't do their job properly and timely in
> conveying decisions relevant to SPI, it's important for DDs to notify
> us, both to protect Debian's decision-making integrity and for SPI's
> own due diligence in conducting transactions. Which is why paragraph 5
> is a useful encouragement.

Well again, not so much opposed to the idea of them giving us
information as much as us actually acting on it.

15 DDs stood in a room and cried foul.

What does that mean?

100 DDs stood in a room and cried foul.

What does that mean?

There are over 300 DDs aren't there?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> - Jimmy Kaplowitz
> jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2007-03-16 19:48:41 Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status
Previous Message Ian Jackson 2007-03-16 19:42:38 Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status