| From: | MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop> | 
|---|---|
| To: | spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, board(at)spi-inc(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity | 
| Date: | 2007-01-16 19:13:54 | 
| Message-ID: | 45ad23f2.Mhya2nfK4vTDk+aF%mjr@phonecoop.coop | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general | 
Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> Draft resolution 2007-01-16.iwj.1.  This is pursuant to MJ Ray's
> "membership communication" item and should probably be treated as a
> proposed amendment to that part of MJ Ray's proposal:
> [...]
> 3. It is good practice to set a deadline for submission of new
>    business, and to list the business to be conducted in meeting
>    announcements.
It may be good to set a deadline for resolution proposals, but it
doesn't seem good practice to try to deadline new business.
>     by T-5 days: Meeting reminder announcement, sent by email,
>                  containing complete list of non-emergency business to
>                  be conducted (NB, _containing_ not _linking to_).
Ow.  So that's Thursday evening in the current model?  I'd struggle to
reschedule if I don't know until then that something I want to oversee
is being discussed.  Please, T-8 (Monday before) at latest.
> 6. For emergency agenda items, [...]
Agreed. A documented emergency item rule would be good.
Regards,
-- 
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ian Jackson | 2007-01-16 19:34:59 | Re: Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity | 
| Previous Message | Ian Jackson | 2007-01-16 19:06:45 | Re: Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity |