Re: SPI-debian relationship

Anthony Towns <aj(at)azure(dot)humbug(dot)org(dot)au> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:00:52PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> > [...] please would the board confirm
> > that SPI will recognise decisions taken according to the Debian
> > Constitution as well as those made by the DPL?
>
> As far as I'm concerned, there's no difference. [...]

I hope that debian is always fortunate in that way.

> I think the only case where it's come up is the legal opinion on including
> Java in non-free, which eventually happened during linux.conf.au so
> I completely forgot to do anything about it. Tsk. I'm not sure how to
> summarise or followup on it while respecting/preserving attorney/client
> privelege, but I've forwarded it on to John now anyway.

Is John satisfied and please will someone let debian-legal know the
outcome?

Thanks,
--
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble.