Re: Charters, manifestos, and SPI's purpose, and forum-widening

From: Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com>
To: Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com>
Cc: board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, treasurer(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Charters, manifestos, and SPI's purpose, and forum-widening
Date: 2007-05-14 20:00:43
Message-ID: 4648BFEB.5090208@perens.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Bruce Perens wrote:
> It costs a lot more to insure a number of people for their full net
> worth than it costs to insure a corporation that doesn't own anything.
> Insurance cost is at least somewhat proportional to the amount you are
> insuring. Covering the DDs as a group gets into the tens of Millions
> pretty quickly. Thus, shifting the burden of liability from the
> individual to the corporation is the essential first step in
> protecting that individual without breaking the bank.
>
OK folks - given the news from Microsoft today, it's time to do this.
Will SPI back it? Do I need a resolution? It will help me convince
Software Freedom Law Center to do the work if SPI backs it. It would be
a separate corporation from SPI for legal reasons - like we don't want
to put the Debian trademark in hock.

Thanks

Bruce

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josip Rodin 2007-05-14 20:58:57 Re: Charters, manifestos, and SPI's purpose, and forum-widening
Previous Message Josip Rodin 2007-05-14 20:00:30 Re: Charters, manifestos, and SPI's purpose, and forum-widening