Re: How does SPI differ from SFC?

From: MJ Ray <mjr(at)debian(dot)org>
To: mrenzmann(at)madwifi(dot)org
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: How does SPI differ from SFC?
Date: 2007-10-02 06:15:00
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

"Michael Renzmann" <mrenzmann(at)madwifi(dot)org> wrote:
> > I'm not sure, but SFC's pumping of itself as a liability protection
> > makes it sound like they have taken out insurance, although I can't
> > find any details of it. On the other hand, they might just be
> > describing the nature of a corporation.
> Can you please explain the meaning of the above two sentences a bit more?

SFC's web site says

"These benefits include, most notably, protection from personal
liability for project developers."

This sounds to me like SFC might have bought the indemnity insurance
that has been suggested to SPI a few times, but dismissed as too
expensive or not desirable. Alternatively, SFC might just be
describing the protection of having a corporation responsible, which
SPI also has.

Josip Rodin <joy(at)entuzijast(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:39:36PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > (although now I notice that SPI's web site copyright terms appear to
> > be missing, at least since the last redesign... oops?).
> To be fair, the old web site didn't mention a license either, AFAICT.

I meant that I hadn't checked the old web site, not that it vanished.

Hope that explains,
MJ Ray tel:+44-844-4437-237 -
Webmaster-developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder,
consumer and workers co-operative member -
Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MJ Ray 2007-10-16 18:14:34 Meeting minuting
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-09-28 15:58:29 Re: How does SPI differ from SFC?