Re: are we being honest about legal resources?

From: Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop>
Subject: Re: are we being honest about legal resources?
Date: 2008-03-12 18:10:10
Message-ID: 47D81C82.7010101@perens.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:37:37 -0600
> John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org> wrote:
>
>>> I just think there's an implementation problem. Today I think the
>>> DDs would only fully trust an organization that they entirely own,
>>> if that, and I missed that fact entirely back then.
>>>
>> Two words: dunc tank.
Please do not label me as suggesting anything like dunc-tank. I
understood why it would be a powder-keg for developers and never
supported it for that reason. Entities that hold money for projects do
not have to do what was suggested for dunc-tank.

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Theodore Tso 2008-03-12 18:34:56 Re: are we being honest about legal resources?
Previous Message MJ Ray 2008-03-12 17:58:46 Re: are we being honest about legal resources?