Re: Licence choice of version proxy, licence stewardship

From: MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop>
To: spi-general(at)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Licence choice of version proxy, licence stewardship
Date: 2008-12-05 11:09:11
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote: [...]
> What do people think ?
> Is SPI now sufficiently stable and robust that this would work without
> putting SPI under undue stress ?

It seems like a worthwhile task for SPI and a way to keep Licence
choice of version in developer hands, while still delegating it from a
particular developer.

I think SPI is sufficiently stable - the officers seem to have started
reporting consistently at last - but I wouldn't like to describe it as
robust until we complete another year of routine operation without a

I doubt there will be widespread member support for this sort of finer
point of licensing/organisations policy, but maybe I'm wrong...?

MJ Ray (slef)
Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop builder for a small
worker cooperative
(Notice tel:+44-844-4437-237

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MJ Ray 2008-12-18 12:44:49 Meeting log for 2008-12-17
Previous Message Ben Finney 2008-12-03 01:41:40 Re: Debian on Causes (Facebook and MySpace)