> The problem is not my reading comprehension. The problem is that the > above reasoning makes no sense to me: if they're committing to do this > work, why do they need the donations to be unrestricted? Surely if > the donations are insufficient funding, they need to add more funds, > not use these funds for other work. We should donate restricted for > the project, not for the outcome, so it'll be usable towards it even > if the total is insufficient.
Yes, there have been a couple of calls for making the grant restricted. I think that's probably the way we should go ... we'll discuss it at the Board meeting next week.