On 23/07/13 05:59, Josh Berkus wrote: > They are looking to join SPI in order to receive funds in the US, not > for an accessible website evaluation. Have a sense of proportion, please.
Sure. Access to the information on that website was desirable to help SPI members fulfil their oversight responsibility if they'd not heard of SMC before.
Happily, useful information was offered by email, for which I thanked people. So I consider the SPI-relevant part of this concluded and ask others to be cautious about continuing this discussion on-list ;-)