Re: Make SPI book keeping more transparent?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Make SPI book keeping more transparent?
Date: 2015-06-11 21:12:19
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

On 06/11/2015 02:10 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
> On Thu Jun 11, 2015 at 13:19:11 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> On 06/11/2015 12:51 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>> claims for compensation (unless the treasurer fooled the auditor).
>>> Is this really a non-issue, or why did i not received any feedback on
>>> the general mailing list?
>> I find it a non-issue as the books accounts are publicly disclosed
>> monthly and we have a CPA/Book Keeper.
> Ok. I would just like to avoid, that we are suprisingly 'hit' by a
> authority financial audit and are not prepared for that or find out
> disagreement only then.

I will note that we no longer have an assistant bookkeeper (as far as I
know). Having a 2nd person who had oversight of all financial
transactions was helpful; SPI should look for a new volunteer for this.


Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohsuke Kawaguchi 2015-06-11 23:51:47 Re: Transferring domain to SPI
Previous Message Martin Zobel-Helas 2015-06-11 21:10:00 Re: Make SPI book keeping more transparent?