Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections)

From: Josh berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections)
Date: 2017-03-07 18:40:41
Message-ID: 7cf9d5ee-4b96-0651-2760-a2b3b5a6aa46@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On 03/07/2017 10:29 AM, Josh berkus wrote:
> But STV is still a "single-winner" system. Any multi-winner
> implementation of it we choose would *still* be experimental

Aha, just found the multi-winner math for STV. Please ignore this part
of my arguments. The other parts still apply.

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Jackson 2017-03-08 11:33:08 Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections)
Previous Message Josh berkus 2017-03-07 18:29:21 Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections)