Re: [Spi-private] SPI board and the software patent issue

From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <marc(at)marcbrockschmidt(dot)de>
To: Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com>
Cc: board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Spi-private] SPI board and the software patent issue
Date: 2006-07-14 17:34:34
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com> writes:
> Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
>> But I don't really see how a seat on the SPI board helps you oppose
> them more effectively
> It's important to get SPI and its members and especially its board more
> involved in issues. This is not just about getting them to help ME to
> oppose anything, it's getting them to do it.

Sadly, one of the board members [1] who is actively working against
software patents has failed to get the SPI members and board more
involved, for example by attending board meetings.

Sorry, if you're saying that you want SPI to take a more prominent
position against software patents [2], you should have tried to do this
as board member. That hasn't happened, so I see no reason to vote for


[1] Bruce Perens
[2] Which I don't believe is something SPI should do, simply because
SPI has another role to play
BOFH #312:
incompatible bit-registration operators

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Goerzen 2006-07-14 17:40:26 Re: [Spi-private] Bruce's Platform
Previous Message Theodore Tso 2006-07-14 17:21:34 Re: [Spi-private] SPI board and the software patent issue