Re: Proposed resolution - rescind position of SPI board advisors

From: Bdale Garbee <bdale(at)gag(dot)com>
To: Tim Potter <tpot(at)frungy(dot)org>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed resolution - rescind position of SPI board advisors
Date: 2019-12-09 22:59:07
Message-ID: 87blshyukk.fsf@gag.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Tim Potter <tpot(at)frungy(dot)org> writes:

> Hi everyone. One item discussed at a recent meeting of the SPI board was
> concerning the position of Board Advisors. Many years ago Board Advisors
> served a useful purpose but have not been used in a very long time. It is
> proposed in this resolution[1] to rescind the positions of SPI Board
> Advisors.

It's not clear to me why you need to rescind the resolution instead of
just continuing to not actually appoint or seek advice from existing
appointees. What's the problem you're actually trying to solve?

Bdale

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Michlmayr 2019-12-09 23:19:03 Re: Proposed resolution - rescind position of SPI board advisors
Previous Message Luca Filipozzi 2019-12-09 22:49:48 Re: Proposed resolution - rescind position of SPI board advisors